Google, ChatGPT, and others as a new source of a second opinion

OLZE Technical Article: Google ChatGPT

Between Digital Information and Medical Responsibility

More and more people are turning to the internet for information before or after a dental appointment. Search engines and AI systems like ChatGPT provide quick answers. But how reliable is this information, and what are its limitations?

OLZE Technical Article: Google ChatGPT

Find out here what role Google and AI systems like ChatGPT can play in medical matters—and where caution is advised.

Yes. Studies show that a large portion of the population searches for health information online, often before or after doctor's appointments. Search engines are usually the first place they turn to.

The quality varies greatly. Studies show that many freely accessible websites are incomplete or difficult to understand. Reliable sources are usually professional associations, university hospitals, or official health portals.

AI can provide structured information and explain relationships. However, studies show that while the answers may seem technically plausible, they are not always complete or accurate. Under no circumstances should they replace a medical examination.

Digital information can help you prepare for a consultation or better understand medical terms. However, an individual diagnosis and treatment plan should always be based on a personal examination.

Why We Look for Medical Information Online

Health is a sensitive topic. Many people want to better understand their diagnoses or compare treatment options at home in the comfort of their own space. According to international
surveys, a significant proportion of adults regularly research health-related questions online at
. The desire for transparency and a say in decision-making is
understandable and fundamentally positive.

OLZE Technical Article: Google ChatGPT 02

The Limits of Search Engines

Search engines rank content based on relevance and popularity, not on medical
quality. As a result, reputable expert information appears alongside simplified blogs or
posts written for commercial purposes. Studies show significant differences in accuracy,
evidence-based content, and clarity. Without expert guidance, this can lead to
misjudgments.

Risks of AI as an Information Tool

Language models are capable of organizing complex topics in an understandable way and providing clear answers to frequently asked questions. However, studies show that while AI responses are coherently formulated, they occasionally contain errors or incomplete information. This is particularly true for individual medical findings, where the crucial clinical context is often missing.

Digital information is no substitute for a diagnosis

A second opinion in the medical sense is based on examinations, test results, and an individual’s medical history (
). Neither Google nor AI systems have access to this data. They provide general knowledge (
), but do not offer a personalized risk assessment. Medical responsibility (
) therefore remains irreplaceable.

Have you found information online that makes you feel uncertain or raises questions?

Feel free to bring the information you’ve gathered to your appointment with your dentist in Berlin. We’ll discuss your questions openly and provide expert guidance on the digital information.